How does Shahmal's cork save the story from slipping into a sudden anticlimax?
How does Shahmal's cork save the story from slipping into a sudden anticlimax?
In the short story "The Story of an Hour" by Kate Chopin, Shahmal's cork, mentioned in the line "Someone was opening the front door with a latchkey. It was Brently Mallard who entered, a little travel-stained, composedly carrying his grip-sack and umbrella. He had been far from the scene of the accident, and did not even know there had been one. He stood amazed at Josephine’s piercing cry; at Richards’ quick motion to screen him from the view of his wife. But Richards was too late. When the doctors came they said she had died of heart disease—of the joy that kills", actually heightens the story's dramatic irony, pushing it toward its devastating climax rather than saving it from an anticlimax.
Here's how:
- False Hope and Crushing Reality: Louise experiences a profound sense of liberation upon believing her husband is dead. The opening of the door and her husband, Brently, walking in shatters that newfound freedom instantly. The shock of this reality is what leads to her death.
- Heightened Irony: The fact that Brently was alive all along and unaware of the accident creates a significant layer of dramatic irony. The reader knows what Louise believes and what she is feeling, while Brently is completely oblivious. This irony intensifies the tragic impact of the ending.
In essence, Shahmal's cork, or rather Brently's unexpected return, serves as the catalyst for the story's tragic ending, ensuring it concludes with a powerful and ironic climax rather than petering out into a less impactful anticlimax.